Category

Medicaid

New Fact Sheet: The Dangers of AHCA for Older Adults

By | FACT SHEET, Health Care, Medicaid, REPORTS | No Comments

Because of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), more older adults get health insurance coverage and receive the supports they need to remain in their homes as they age. The American Health Care Act (AHCA), the Republican “repeal and replace” bill, would take away health insurance for 24 million Americans and cut Medicaid funding by 25 percent over the next ten years.

The bill poses many dangers for older adults today and in the future, as it would:

  • Raise the costs of insurance and health care
  • Put pressure on state budgets
  • Lead to cuts in services
  • Undermine the financial stability of Medicare

Read our fact sheet for more information

Fact Sheet: Medicaid Caps & Cuts Harm Older Women

By | FACT SHEET, Medicaid, REPORTS | No Comments

Medicaid provides essential care for women throughout their lives—from family planning and maternal health services to nursing home care. However, yesterday, on International Women’s Day, committees in Congress were busy marking up a GOP ACA replacement bill that will fundamentally change the way Medicaid is funded, making it harder for both older and younger women to be able to pay for health insurance, visit their doctors, and receive long-term care.

These changes to our health care system will make care unaffordable and inaccessible for many, but women will be disproportionately impacted. We laid it out in this new fact sheet, Medicaid Caps and Cuts Harm Older Women, produced in partnership with our friends at the National Partnership for Women & Families. Read and share this fact sheet with other advocates, lawmakers, and others.

For more recent Justice in Aging health care defense resources visit this page. If you missed our webinar on Medicaid cuts and caps earlier this week, you can watch the recording here.

Justice in Aging Statement on the American Health Care Act

By | Health Care, Medicaid, PRESS RELEASE | No Comments

Washington, DC (March 8, 2017) – This statement is from Kevin Prindiville, Executive Director at Justice in Aging, on the American Health Care Act:

“Republican lawmakers in the House have drafted an ACA replacement bill, the American Healthcare Act (AHCA), that is an attack on the health and long-term care needs of older adults. This bill makes health care more expensive, targeting older adults for the deepest cuts in services and the largest increases in cost.”

“We are particularly opposed to the Medicaid cuts at the heart of this bill.  The bill fundamentally changes the promise and structure of Medicaid by capping federal funding for the program at levels that, by design, will leave states without enough funds to meet the health and long-term care needs of older adults over time. Over 6 million older adults rely on Medicaid, and 2/3 of all Medicaid spending for older adults goes to essential long term care services in nursing homes and at home and in the community.  AHCA threatens the care of all of these seniors and the peace of mind of their families.”

“In addition, AHCA makes it harder for older adults age 55-64 to access health care coverage.  By freezing the Medicaid expansion, the bill takes care away from the many low-income older adults age 55-64 who rely on Medicaid to see their doctors and meet their medical needs before they qualify for Medicare. By allowing insurance companies to charge older adults more than 5 times as much for their care, the bill creates what is effectively an “age tax” that will make care for many older adults completely unaffordable.”

“AHCA makes these cuts to the health care of older adults in order to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy. These tax cuts will negatively impact the solvency of the Medicare trust fund, harming the Medicare program for current beneficiaries and those who will rely on it in the future.”

“The American Healthcare Act conflicts with the President’s own promises that he would not touch the safety net upon which seniors rely.  Moreover, lawmakers are attempting to ram it through Congress, without hearings and without complete analysis of just how many millions of people will lose coverage under the plan.”

Justice in Aging is a national non-profit legal advocacy organization that fights senior poverty through law. Formerly the National Senior Citizens Law Center, since 1972 we’ve worked for access to affordable health care and economic security for older adults with limited resources, focusing especially on populations that have traditionally lacked legal protection such as women, people of color, LGBT individuals, and people with limited English proficiency. Through targeted advocacy, litigation, and the trainings and resources we provide to local advocates, we ensure access to the social safety net programs that poor seniors depend on, including Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). 

# # #

Contact: Vanessa Barrington
510-256-1200 direct
vbarrington@justiceinaging.org

WEBINAR: Medicaid Funding Caps Would Harm Older Americans

By | Health Care, Medicaid, WEBINAR | No Comments
When: Tuesday March 7, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. PT/ 2:00 p.m. ET.

One result of the 2016 elections has been increased discussion of Medicaid “cap” proposals. What would happen if federal Medicaid funding were capped, and individual states were given broad authority to re-write their Medicaid programs? How could states maintain necessary health care services with drastic cuts in federal funding? What would Medicaid block grants and per capita caps mean for the older adults you serve?

This webinar explains why the cap proposals would be harmful to the over six million older Americans who rely upon Medicaid coverage. The webinar includes advocacy strategies to retain current Medicaid protections and prevent cuts—without a doubt, the next few months are critical for all who care about health care for low-income older Americans.

Read More

Fact Sheet: Medicaid Funding Caps Would Harm Older Americans

By | FACT SHEET, Medicaid, REPORTS, Uncategorized | No Comments

On February 16, 2017, Republicans released their latest proposal outlining their ideas to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. This proposal radically changes the Medicaid program by capping the amount states will receive in federal funding to deliver healthcare to low-income individuals. These capped proposals, either block grants or per-capita allotments, aim to catastrophically cut Medicaid and eliminate important consumer protections currently in place.

States will be forced to make difficult choices regarding what services they can deliver and what populations they will be able to serve, placing increased pressures on state budgets. Crucial programs that allow seniors to age at home rather than receiving care in institutional settings are at risk.

This latest replacement proposal does not come close to the improved coverage and affordability offered through the ACA for older adults. The plan will increase the cost of care and limit access to health care for older adults, especially low-to-middle income older adults. Specifically, the plan decreases tax credits, reintroduces high-risk pools for the most sick, and increases the availability of health savings accounts that provide little benefit for low to middle income consumers.

Justice in Aging has developed a new fact sheet showing how cuts to Medicaid through capped Medicaid funding would hurt older adults. For more detailed information on how capped funding would impact older adults, see our issue brief.

Medicaid Funding Caps Would Harm Older Americans

By | Health Care, ISSUE BRIEF, Medicaid, REPORTS | No Comments

Recent months have seen increased discussion of proposals to cap federal Medicaid spending. Under these proposals, the federal government would provide limited funding through either block grants or per capita payments to states, and states would have broad discretion to set their own Medicaid standards.

A new issue brief from Justice in Aging explains how these proposals would harm older Americans. The caps would result in a dramatic reduction in federal funding for Medicaid, and these crippling cuts would be exacerbated by the loss of longstanding federal protections. Potential consequences include loss of services, cutbacks in eligibility, unaffordable health care costs, and diminished quality of care.

The issue brief provides careful analysis of both the “cap” proposals and the protections of existing Medicaid law. Many of the proposals tout the “flexibility” of giving almost complete discretion to states. As the issue brief highlights, however, consumer protections in current Medicaid law are vital to older Americans’ health and financial security.

Repeal of the ACA—Without a Replacement—Threatens California Seniors

By | Affordable Care Act, BLOG, DUAL DEMONSTRATIONS, DUAL ELIGIBLES, Health Care, HOMEPAGE, Medicaid, Medicare | No Comments
There are currently 7.6 million older adults living in California who rely on Medicare, Medi-Cal, and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to see a doctor, receive care in their home, and pay for prescription drugs. The repeal of the ACA threatens these critical programs, jeopardizing the care seniors receive every day. Read More

Repealing the Affordable Care Act without a Replacement Hurts Seniors

By | Affordable Care Act, BLOG, DUAL ELIGIBLES, Health Care, HOMEPAGE, Medicaid, Medicare, Safety Net Defense | No Comments
Every day, whether seniors need to see a doctor, receive care in their home, or pay for prescription drugs, Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are lifelines for older adults. However, the entire health care system upon which older adults rely is at risk in the new Congress. Changes to the ACA will dramatically alter the Medicare and Medicaid programs, and jeopardize the care seniors receive each day. Read More

Systemic Denti-Cal Problems Increase Financial Hardship for Older Adults

By | BLOG, Health Care, HOMEPAGE, Medicaid, Medicare, Oral Health | No Comments
Linda—a low-income older adult living in Los Angeles County—applied for a dental credit card after being advised to do so by her dentist. Her dentist’s office explained that, while she has dental coverage through Denti-Cal, it often takes a long time to get authorizations approved and it would be in her best interest to pay right now with the card and get reimbursed later. When Linda received her statement, it showed she owed over $2,000. Not only did she receive services that were not covered by her insurance, she also was charged for services that should have been covered by Denti-Cal but that were denied because her dentist’s office did not properly submit the claim to Denti-Cal. Unable to pay the $2,000 within the no-interest six month promotional period, Linda was hit with the balance plus six months of interest that accrued at 26.9%. Distraught, Linda contacted a legal advocate who is now working to dispute the charges and to rescind the credit card contract. Read More