Justice in Aging has filed a class action lawsuit against Florida’s Agency for Health Care Administration. Currently, older adults and people with disabilities could wait up to 3.5 years to access in-home health care. Justice in Aging wants Florida to develop more in-home care services for people and increase the capacity of the services it has. Litigation Director Regan Bailey said “it’s a need that’s growing. And the way to meet that need is to provide more community-based services because you can serve many more people for the same money in the community versus in a nursing facility.”
WASHINGTON, DC – Justice in Aging is pleased to welcome Regan Bailey as its new Litigation Director. Justice in Aging is a national legal advocacy organization that uses the power of law to fight senior poverty. Regan will be working in the organization’s Washington, DC office.
Regan joins Justice in Aging after serving for the past five years at the US Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division in the Special Litigation Section as a Trial Attorney. Prior to joining the Department of Justice, Regan directed legal advocacy for Disability Rights Washington. Previously she served as the Assistant Director for Public Benefits and Economic Stability at Maryland Legal Aid Bureau, a Senior Attorney at University Legal Services, and a Managing Attorney at West Virginia Advocates. She was a Writ Clerk for the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia and was also a Staff Attorney for DNA People’s Legal Services for the Navajo Nation.
We filed this case to stop SSA from attempting to collect “overpayments” from very low income people over 65 and people with disabilities receiving SSI who had been married to someone of the same sex on or before June 2013 when the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Read More
Ohio’s Medicaid program covered only a portion of the program’s assisted living bills, leaving frail seniors Betty Hilleger and Geraldine Saunders with unexpected sky-high expenses. And they were not alone. Thousands of Ohio’s seniors faced the same coverage gap. They applied for coverage, but faced delays and unreasonable bills even after they were supposed to be covered. Justice in Aging joined with the Cincinnati firm Beckman Weil Shepardson to represent Hilleger and Saunders in a class action suit against the state to eliminate this coverage gap.
The misguided policy that nearly made Rosa Martinez homeless is rearing its ugly head again. Rosa Martinez, a California woman whose disability benefits were stopped because the Social Security Administration mistook her for a Florida woman with the same name, was Justice in Aging’s lead Plaintiff in the case Martinez v. Astrue.
(5/9/2011) The instructions are similar to those contained in EM-11032 issued last month which instructed SSA field offices that pursuant to the decision in Clark, benefits would no longer be suspended or denied solely on the basis of a warrant for an alleged violation of probation or parole.
Anyone who has an appeal pending at the ALJ stage at which this is the only issue should request an on the record decision and attach a copy of the Chief Judge Bulletin.
While these two sets of instructions should resolve the issue for everyone with a currently pending claim, they do not apply to the tens of thousands of class members who may ultimately be entitled to retroactive relief since the court has not yet ruled on the relief to be awarded to the class.
In the meantime, anyone whose benefits were suspended or denied on or after October 24, 2006 because of a probation or parole warrant should be sure that the Social Security Administration has their current address so that they will receive notice of any potential relief.